Secondly, many atheists continue to believe that because they don't believe in God, they therefore remain unencumbered and free from theology because they don't believe in God. But atheism is a theology (although false) and for an atheist to believe they do make not statements about the nature of the reality of God is like a flat earth believer stating they're only making statements about the geometry of the land surface; not the nature of the structure of the earth. Obviously both are nonsense. There is also an implication to the atheist conceit that they neither realize, nor properly apply, so let me do so here.

To begin, let's dispense with the atheistic special pleading. Once you do so, the logical extension of atheist belief is that all are subject to a certain set of beliefs. That misses the mark. What is true is that all are subject to rebellion against God - not accepting the Kingship of God and rebelling against his commands. Those who recognize this condition realize they need to make amends and peace needs to be made with God.  The problem is man tends to come up with his own solutions - solutions that wind up enshrined in false philosophies and false religions.

Man, in and of himself, is unable to please God². That is why God himself made a way through his son Jesus, who died and rose on the third day³ to make a way for all those who are stained with the of rebellion of Adam's sin⁴ - a way to live with Him forever when they (meaning you) believe that Jesus died and rose for them, and accept him as Lord and Savior.⁵

Someone will tell me that's all Christian theology. Granted, it is - based on the historical faith that is Christianity. The death and resurrection of Jesus is all very well documented, as are the miracles of Jesus, so I have good reason to believe it.  But what basis does an atheist have to disbelieve? Let me clarify that. What reason, once you eliminate all the irrational arguments, special pleadings and the faith in irrational scientific beliefs (like life comes from lifelessness and universes come from nothing) -  what rational reason can an atheist point to justify their beliefs? I find that generally beneath it all many atheists are simply angry at God because God didn't do something they thought he should have (or vice versa), but anger at God for some imagined wrong does not mean God does not exist. Obviously it's quite the opposite.

I submit, there are no rational reasons for atheism, only irrational ones (like the above one), which is why atheists keep spouting irrational beliefs - because they're backed by irrational arguments and false conceits.  Because whenever you take a closer look, there simply are no rational arguments that fit both atheistic beliefs and the nature of reality. If atheists were honest with themselves and stop the special pleadings, they'd admit that life does not come from lifelessness; and clearly designed creatures and universes do not come from random processes - however amount of time you give them.

But atheists prefer thinking themselves superior; and that the nonsense stories they tell are true.  And so they will continue with their special pleadings and false arguments - such as the one we're looking at today - namely that theists are products of their environment while atheists have somehow overcome that. When you come across such patently incorrect and irrational arguments, try not to laugh out loud at them - increasingly atheists tend to anger easily, especially when shown how irrational their arguments are, and how foolish it makes them look - trying to defend the irrational.