|
|
|
Question Evolution Day 2022
Christians are called to make "the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil." (Ep 5.16) February 12, Darwin's Birthday, has become a great opportunity to do that. Like Halloween has become an opportunity to give people gospel tracks when they come to your door asking you for stuff, the day some are celebrating Darwin and evolution is the perfect opportunity to offer them the red pill by suggesting they question evolution on Question Evolution Day. If they've never heard about it, point them to Cowboy Bob's page here to show them it's a real thing, then go on to present them questions and evidence that will help them to see just how wrong and meritless Darwin's theory of evolution is. Here at Rational Faith, we've been doing that for the past few years since hearing of it.
So for this year's Question Evolution Day informational give away we'll take a brief look at one of the problems Darwinian evolution has with what's known as the Cambrian Explosion. There are a number, but to keep it somewhat brief, we'll focus on just one of the numerous issues.
The Problem of the Cambrian Explosion
Paleontologist and celebrated evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould, co-author of the evolutionary theory of "Punctuated Equilibirum" is quoted as saying:
"Nothing Distressed Darwin more than the Cambrian Explosion" [1]
Why would that be? To understand, you must first understand one of the main tenets of Darwinian evolution. Respected evolutionist Ernst Mayr breaks the tenets down into five statments. We'll focus our attention on the third statement. Mayr states it succinctly as:
"3. The gradualness of evolution (no Saltations, no discontinuities)" [2]
A saltation is a jump, a gap in what is supposed to be a very smooth series. According to Darwin, evolution happens by the accumulation of multitudes of very small changes. Since there are many small changes, you should not see leaps from one type of thing to a completely different type of thing. That is a jump or saltation, and is totally outlawed in Darwin's Theory of evolution by Natural Selection as detailed in his famous 1859 book "Origin of Species." Even the newer theory of Neo-Darwinism, updated to include mutations as a mechanism of change, (something Darwin knew nothing about), still expects the mutations to be small random changes that accumulate, and thus you should still see no saltations. No jumps in the record. But that's not what you find when you look at the fossil record, which believers in Darwinian evolution regard as a reasonably reliable record of history of life on earth.
The Geologic Column
The Geologic column is a construct evolutionists use as an organizational tool. They use it to divide up supposed previous eras in earth's supposed 4.6 billion year history into periods where various types of creatures existed - often in distinct time periods. I call it a "construct" because the complete column as depicted above or in numerous other depictions with well defined layers and typical "index" fossils, exist only in museums and evolutionary text books. It does not exist as depicted in reality.
In the geologic column, the layers are used to date the fossils, and the fossils are used to date the layer, an obvious and critical logical error I discus in the previous article here, but we won't worry about that now. For now we're focusing on another error associated with the evolutionary understanding of the geological column. Earth's history of creatures is supposed to go back millions of years, with various creatures during different periods. But note, around the time of the Cambrian period, there is an "explosion" of life evident in the fossil record. Below the Cambrian layer, fossils of any kind are extremely rare. In the Darwinian scheme, "below" is "before."
The Insurmountable problem of the Cambrian Explosion
The problem for evolutionists is, the fossils in the Cambrian layer are complex, fully formed creatures of nearly every body type ("phylum" is the technical term) without precursors. Without previous less complex creatures (transitional forms) leading to the complex creatures found in the Cambrian. That, according to Darwin's theory, is impossible.
Trilobites, for example, are an "index" fossil for the Cambrian. If you find a trilobite fossil it is supposedly from the Cambrian period which runs some 500 - 600 million years ago. But trilobites are very complex creatures.
"The biological structure of a Cambrian Trilobite was as complex and sophisticated as a modern crab. Its organs included a brain, gut, heart and compound eyes."[3]
And the compound eyes are among the most complex found in any creature, anywhere at any time. So trilobites are not simple creatures. They're very complex. And they appear in the lowest, and thus supposedly oldest Cambrian layers supposedly containing the simplest creatures. And they appear without precursors. Without forerunners. Without transitional forms below them. They just appear. In terms of Darwinian evolution, that's impossible. This is what troubled Darwin. It's also what falsifies his theory as I point out here. In fact, in his "Origin of Species" Darwin laments,
“Consequently, if the theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Cambrian stratum was deposited long periods elapsed, ... and that during these vast periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. ...
To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earlier periods prior to the Cambrian, I can give no satisfactory answer.”[4]
Darwin's answer? The fossil record is incomplete:
"...I believe the answer mainly lies in the record being incomparably less perfect than is generally supposed."[5]
Darwin could get away with that in 1859. But it's been more than 150 years that paleontologists and others have been digging up fossils and examining the fossil record. And still, after all this time and research, no indication of the many numerous transitional forms needed to validate his theory that Darwin expected would be found. But now, its more than just lack of evidence of transitional forms. Discoveries in China have demonstrated the fossil record is not incomplete in a manner that will save Darwin's theory. Rather, it's replete with fossils that destroy Darwin's theory
The Chengjiang Fossils of China
Outside of the small town of Chengjiang, in the Yunnan province of China, a remarkable fossil find was made in 1984. Discovered there, beautifully preserved, were fossils not only of hard-shelled creatures like trilobites that are expected to be preserved, but also creatures with soft tissues which no one ever expected to be preserved in the fossil record.
Above - Chengjiang hard shelled Triolobite
fossil
Below - Chengjiang soft-shelled creature
fossil
Above - Chengjiang fossilized sponge embryo
"Icons of Evolution" Author Jonathan Wells narrates concerning the soft-tissue creatures:
"No hard parts, no skeletons, no shells, just soft-bodied, and yet they're exquisitely preserved."[6]
So near Chengjian, China are fossils of both hard-bodied and soft-bodied creatures. Those finds include fossils of embryos of sponges found below the Cambrian layer. So even something as small, soft and fragile as an embryo has been preserved in the fossil record. "Signature in the Cell" author Stephen Meyer sums up the significance:
"If these lower strata can preserve an embryo, If they can preserve a soft microscopic embryo, then why couldn't they have preserved a larger ancestral forms that supposedly evolved into the Cambrian animals? In other words, if you can preserve something as fragile as an embryo, why couldn't you in the same strata of rock preserve the immediate ancestor of a hard-shelled trilobite?"[7]
Darwin's excuse proved wrong
Darwin claimed the fossil record was incomplete. With the find of the Chengjiang fossils, it's clear the problem is not that the fossil record is incomplete. The problem is Darwin in particular, and evolutionists in general misunderstand what the fossil record represents. The fossil record and the geological column are not a record in fossils of creatures over supposed millions of years. The fossil record represents creatures rapidly buried in the flood of Noah's day. (Rapid burial is the only way you get a fossil. Otherwise natural processes - predators, etc destroy the carcass.) And they were buried in the order of their proximity to waters (the flood started with the breaking open of the "fountains of the great deep" - Gen 7.11) and their mobility and ability to escape rising flood waters.
Note the order of burial in the Geologic column above (starting from the bottom): Fish, Amphibians, Reptiles, Mammals and (not depicted) Birds. Fish, being in the water when the catastrophe started are obviously going to be buried first. They can't escape being in water, so there's no where for them to flee to. Next, creatures who live part-time in water - amphibians are next. Next, the less agile slower reptiles are buried followed by the faster ones. Finally the agile mammals, and last, birds which could fly presumably until they found no place to land, as the waters completely covered the earth. With no place to land the birds were finally overtaken by the waters and forced down due to sheer exhaustion. This is a consistent explanation of the fossil record within the Creationist worldview.
Notice there is no explanation for the Cambrian explosion within the Darwinian evolutionary world view. Darwinists can still find "no satisfactory answer" to it. They have neither leg nor fossil to stand on to explain the undisputed evidence of the fossil record of the Cambrian explosion.
Duane Caldwell | February 11, 2022
Follow @rational_faith_
Notes
1. Stephen Jay Gould, ref from "Darwin's
Dilemma:The Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record", Illustra Media
Documentary, DVD, 2009
Back
2. Ernst Mayr, What
Evolution Is, New York:Basic Books, 2001, p. 86
Back
3. Narrator, "Darwin's
Dilemma:The Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record", Illustra Media
Documentary, DVD, 2009
Back
4.
Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection,
Sixth London Edition, with all Additions and Corrections, First published 1859;
This edition published by Enhanced Media , p. 292 Kindle Loc 5212
Back
5.
Darwin, Origin of Species, p. 137, Kindle loc 2438
Back
6.
Jonathan Wells, ref. from
"Darwin's Dilemma:The
Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record"
Back
7.
Stephen C Meyer, ref. from
"Darwin's Dilemma:The
Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record"
Back
Images
Featured - The Chicago
Field Museum's Exhibit on the Cambrian Explosion - by
Sonlight Tours
The Geologic Column - Pinterest
Chengjiang Fossils - Darwin's Dilemma - Illustra Media