We're coming up on the second anniversary of what was supposed to be the "Area 51 Raid" or "Storm Area 51" as it was alternately known. The event, which occurred on September 20, 2019, turned out to be much smaller than planners had hoped. (100 -150 showed.) But with more than 2 million indicating they were going and another 1.5 million expressing interest on Facebook clearly there remains a great amount of interest in the matter, even if people are reluctant to move beyond their computers or mobile devices to show up in person at a Nevada desert . The goal of the event was to force U.S. Government officials to reveal the information it is assumed they have on extra-terrestrial aliens and UFOs.
At this juncture a brief history of how we
got to this point would be helpful, but it's somewhat lengthy, so I
won't insert it here. Instead I'll leave it as a sidebar below for those
interested. It will, however, be helpful to clarify some terms here:
Please note: UFOs are just that - unidentified flying objects. Don't assume that means extra-terrestrial aliens are involved. In this interview on Town Square, astrophysicist Michio Kaku states that 95% of them turn out to be ordinary objects or phenomena that are not recognized: Venus at night, weather balloons, swamp gas, weather anomalies, and other unnamed items like test aircraft (which are sometimes kept secret) , etc. But in the minds of many, "UFO" is synonymous with "extra-terrestrial alien" so the military doesn't like that term and prefers UAP - unidentified aerial phenomena. USOs are just like UFOs - except they also submerge under water for part or all of their sightings.
At this point let me list some key facts:
If that's a new thought for you, here is what I hope is a step by step journey to understanding:
UFOs are real
Please note the terminology. I'm not saying extra-terrestrial aliens are real, I'm saying people, including astronauts and navy pilots, are actually seeing things flying that they cannot identify. The conflation of aliens with UFOs is why the military no longer users the term UFO.
With regards to the witnesses, it's not just average people who have sightings, but trained observers like pilots and astronauts who are not compromised (on drugs, psychotic, etc.) and have no reason to lie about it. Further, it's not just sightings. There are physical effects: they're viewable on radar, they're captured on various types of cameras - this in addition to being seen by the witnesses. And as professor Kaku tells Tucker Carlson during the segment on the Area 51 raid, instead of the burden of proof being on UFO witnesses to prove they're real, the burden of proof has shifted to the government and the military to prove they're not real. Because the evidence is "overwhelming."
What's brought these sightings to the forefront of mainstream reporting by people like Tucker Carlson however is the video captured by Navy pilots. There are three, each one with a unique name:
Note that not only can these objects move
(accelerate/decelerate, climb/dive, stop) in ways impossible for any
known technology, but they also defy the laws of physics. (Breaking the
sound barrier with no sonic boom, pulling g forces that would kill a
human, showing no exhaust plume - which should be visible, multiple UFOs
merge, they morph form, etc.) And keep in mind these are official Navy
recordings and reports. (Though all the listed impossible phenomena are
not in the videos.) But they aren't the only reports. In fact the
DOD Task force, commissioned to report on UFO's, studied 144
incidents. They could only explain one. Meaning there are at least 143
incidents of "
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena"
the DOD cannot explain. As Tucker Carlson put it, "So the most
sophisticated military in the world has no idea what these things are or
even how they move from place to place."
And there are plenty of other reports besides the three Navy videos
above. Here are a few: (I will leave the details of the encounters to
the linked videos, which are not actually video sightings but recreations
of what happened, some of which contain actual photo evidence however.)
The Stockholme Incident
Note: These sightings use various different technologies to capture the image, also they're from different witnesses, different places and countries. The incidents include pilots, astronauts, submarine personnel, generals, governors of states. These sightings cannot be passed off as the illusions of mistaken witnesses, or bad/damaged equipment, counter electronic warfare or any of the common mundane, but clearly wrong explanations. There are simply too many over too long a period of time (hundreds of years actually) seen by too diverse a group of people from diverse countries and time periods. No, these cannot be simply brushed aside as some kind of mistake or error. As astrophysicist Michio Kaku points out, "the evidence is overwhelming."
Common Secular Explanations Fail
Also as professor Kaku points out there are a number of aspects of these objects that cannot be explained: the speed and agility with which they move, appear and disappear, pull unimaginable g forces, break the sound barrier with no sonic boom, etc. etc. The various witnesses (generals, air force pilots, governors of states), Kaku says, state these incidents are simply "Beyond our understanding of the laws of physics." He goes on to say, "the handful of things that still cannot be explained defy known laws of physics." That's an astrophysicist talking.
Let's explore for a moment what they mean when they say these things "defy" the known laws of physic. Let's consider just one aspect: no sonic booms. Any time an object moves faster than the speed of sound, a sonic boom is created. Why? When an object moves through the air at subsonic speeds, a pressure wave is created around the object. This pressure wave allows the air to flow around the object and get out of the way of the object smoothly as it moves. But when the object moves at supersonic speeds, the air no longer has time to get out of the way. The object impacts the air before the pressure wave can move it out the way. The result is a shock wave, a sudden drastic change of pressure which creates the sonic boom, which attaches itself to the object (typically an aircraft) and flows backward from the aircraft. The resulting sonic boom is created for the entire duration of time that the object is moving at supersonic speeds, following the craft from the attachment points of the shock wave (the leading and trailing edges). This happens anytime a physical object is moving at supersonic speeds. Note in passing, the supersonic Concorde was limited to flying routes over oceans. Why? Because they didn't want the supersonic jets creating the very loud sonic booms day and night all over the country, particularly over heavily populated areas. And it would defeat the purpose to fly the Concorde at sub-sonic speeds (though they reportedly did do that for one segment (Braniff) for one route) across the country. You don't need the super-sophisticated supersonic Concorde flying at sub-sonic speeds across the country. Any airliner can do that. So it's quite significant for scientists and the military to note there are no sonic booms. It confirms what they're saying: they defy the laws of physics.
So like the scientists, the military are just as perplexed. They have no idea what these UFOs/UAPs are, or how they do what they do. But since they are loathe to admit there is an intelligence that invades their airspace at will, clearly posing a threat, and they - the military - can do nothing about it, they therefore will not go into detail about how much they don't know. Tellingly, the closest guess professor Kaku can come up with is that the UFOs are either experimental hyper-sonic drones that move at 5 to 20 times the speed of sound, or (the game changer) they are created by extraterrestrials who could be thousands or millions or years more advanced than us and have a deeper understanding of physics. I find it amazing that Kaku is proposing hypersonic craft given what's being observed and specifcallly that they create no sonic boom. I suspect the only reason he mentions it is so that he has an option other than his "game changer." Here you see why worldviews are so important. In the Christian worldview ET's of the type he describes are precluded, as are millions of years - since the universe is little more than 6,000 years old. When you consider that it can't be either of Kaku's suggestions (it can't be a human made hyper-sonic craft for reasons discussed above, and it can't be multi-million year old aliens since the universe is only thousands, not millions of years old) you realize Kaku, as brilliant as he is, has no idea what they are. And I suspect that is because he lets his secular blinders prevent him from considering the obvious.
The Jacque Vallée Understanding/Explanation
Jacque Vallée came very close. Consider this summary of his views:
The idea of an "extra-dimensional" being is part of the Inter-Dimensional Hypothesis (IDH) - which overcomes the travel distance problem. So Vallée is taking seriously that this intelligence is able to defy the laws of physics, - though IDH does not explain all the phenomena. He also takes seriously that these entities have been manifesting for hundreds of years (I'd say since the garden of Eden), and particularly with his book "Messengers of Deception" he recognizes these entities are at root deceptive. But he still hasn't put the whole picture together yet. His secular worldview precludes him from considering the real origin of the UFO's: the spiritual realm. This is the wall most UFO researchers run into which keeps them from recognizing the truth.
The J. Allen Hynek Understanding/Explanation
Both Hynek and Vallée, who collaborated for a time in research efforts, came to the conclusions that UFO phenomena could not be merely physical objects. Hynek put it this way:
So once again, Hynek is close, but his secular blinders prevent him from seeing the full truth.
The Christian Understanding - The Mystery of UFOs and USOs solved
Once you remove the secular blinders that prevent you from considering spiritual truths, you're free to consider not just extra dimensions but the spiritual dimension. Which leads to the obvious question: Can UFO's be manifestations of demons? Let's review the evidence:
Are we aware of any creatures in scripture that meet this description? Let me throw in a couple of more descriptors:
Is the picture clearer now? It should be crystal clear. These entities who have appeared throughout history in various forms displaying technology such as flying canoes to Indians, flying shields to ancient Romans, flying sailing ships, flying dirigibles, and today as UFOs are one and the same group: they are fallen angels. Demons. Consider the following scriptural description of angels (Remembering whatever angels can do, demons being fallen angels, can also do.)
What does Satan do? He seeks to destroy. John 10.10 How does he do that? By deception. By changing his appearance. As he did in the garden (Gen 3.1), or as he does when making himself appear as an angel of light. (2 Cor 11.14-15) Truly, there is nothing new under the sun (Eccl 1.9). Satan has been deceiving people by appearing to be an advanced or knowledgeable being since the beginning of time. But as Christians, we are not unaware of his schemes. (2 Cor 2.11)
John Keel, a UFO researcher, has summed it up well:
"The UFOs do not seem to exist as tangible, manufactured objects. They do not conform to the natural laws of our environment. They seem to be nothing more than transmogrifications tailoring themselves to our abilities to understand. The thousands of contacts with the entities indicate that they are liars and put-on artists. The UFO manifestations seem to be, by and large, merely minor variations of the age old demonological phenomenon." (emphasis mine)
In A talking snake and the alien connection, I detailed the nature of the deception that Eve was subject to in the garden by the serpent. I addressed the question as to whether Satan possessed a snake, or transformed to appear as a snake. (In the article I explain why I suspect he transformed his appearance, as it says he does in 2 Cor 11.14, and as he is clearly doing with the many UFO appearances throughout history.)
However a question not addressed is why did he appear as a snake? When you consider both the context of the Eden appearance, and the insight of Jacques Vallée, the answer becomes clear. Satan clearly wants to depict himself as more advanced than humans. Yet he couldn't appear as another human. There was only one other human, and if Satan wanted to appear superior to man, he couldn't appear to Eve as the only other human in existence - Adam. There were no legends of fairies, goblins or little green men for him to draw on at the time. So that was out. What options did Satan have left to appear to Eve in a form she would understand?
Eve would not have understood the form of flying saucers, or dirigibles or sailing ships. That would have been completely beyond her comprehension. So Satan was severely limited in the types of deception he could use on Eve. It couldn't be technological. It couldn't be human. Satan was clearly limited in his options. The only question that remains is who chose the final form he used to appear as, God or Satan? Regardless of who chose, that form would become a representation of his true nature, what would be in the Bible a symbol of deception and rebellion: a snake.
Thus the mysterious, unable to be explained UFOs can be explained: they are manifestations of demons. As Christians, we are to "Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them." (Ep 5.11) Do not be deceived by the UFO phenomenon, but rather expose them as the lying demons that they are.
Duane Caldwell | September 16, 2021
1. Tucker Carlson, from "Tucker Carlson Tonight",
Broadcast on Fox, 6/25/2021
2. Michio Kaku, from "Tucker Carlson Tonight",
Broadcast on Fox, 9/20/2019
3. Michio Kaku on Town Square from video "Michio
Kaku - Are UFO's Real?", YouTube April 24, 2016,
4. Narrator summary from video "Jacques Vallée,
UFOs, and the Case Against Aliens", YouTube, Jan 22,2017,
5. Dr J. Allen Hynek, Today's Student,
April 3, 1978
ref. From Gary Bates, "Alien Abductions and UFOs - Exposed!", Creation Ministries International (DVD), 2009
6.Gary Bates points this out in his presentation
Gary Bates, "Aliens, UFO's and the Bible - Are we Alone In the Universe", Answers In Genesis (VHS), 2004
7. Related by Gary Bates in:
Alien "Abductions and UFOs - Exposed", Creation Ministries International (DVD), 2009
Bates, Gary, "Abductions and UFOs - Exposed", Creation Ministries International (DVD), 2009
Bates, Gary, "Aliens, UFO's and the Bible - Are we Alone In the Universe", Answers In Genesis (VHS), 2004
Carlson, Tucker, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox News Broadcast, Sept 20, 2019 (Topic: Raid on Area 51)
Carlson, Tucker, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox News Broadcast, Aug 21, 2020 (Topic: DOD UFO Task Force)
Carlson, Tucker, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Fox News Broadcast, June 25, 2021 (Topic: DOD TaskForce Report)
Cukoo for Kaku (YouTube Account), "Michio Kaku - Are UFO's Real, Apr 24, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v12kdzbyDFg
Documentary: UFOs: Uncovering the Truth - Deep Sea Encounters, AHC, Original Air Date: 6/17/2017
Documentary: UFOs: Uncovering the Truth - Pilots & Astronauts, AHC, Original Air Date: 7/15/2017
Dyer, Andrew, "U.S. Navy says it's tracking UFOs", The San Diego Union-Tribune, Sep 17, 2019
Epstein, Kayla "Those UFO videos are real, the Navy says, but please stop saying ‘UFO’", The Washington Post, Sept 18, 2019, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2019/09/18/those-ufo-videos-are-real-navy-says-please-stop-saying-ufo/
Ham, Ken, "Do I believe In UFOs? Absolutely!", Answers In Genesis, Dec 5, 2007, https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/alien-life/do-i-believe-in-ufos-absolutely/
Think Anonymous (YouTube Account), "Jacque Vallée, UFOs, and the Case Against Aliens", Jan 22, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhM6q7roy1w
Wootson Jr., Cleve R., "The Government admits it studies UFOs. So about those Area 51 conspiracy Theories...", The Washington Post, Dec. 18, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/12/18/the-government-admits-it-studies-ufos-so-about-those-area-51-conspiracy-theories/